Health state utility estimates for value assessments of novel treatments in Huntington's disease: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Huntington's disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with a devastating impact on patients and their families. Quantifying how treatments affect patient outcomes is critical for informing reimbursement decisions. Many countries mandate a formal value assessment in which the treatment benefit is measured as quality-adjusted life-years, calculated with the use of utility estimates that reflect respondents' preferences for health states. OBJECTIVE: To summarize published health state utility data in HD and identify gaps and uncertainties in the data available that could be used to inform value assessments. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of studies that used preference-based instruments (e.g., EQ-5D and SF-6D) to estimate utility values for people with HD. The studies were published between January 2012 and December 2022. RESULTS: Of 383 articles screened, 16 articles reported utility values estimated in 11 distinct studies. The utility measure most frequently reported was EQ-5D (9/11 studies). Two studies reported SF-6D data; one used time trade-off methods to value health state descriptions (vignettes). Although utility scores generally worsened to a lower value with increased HD severity, the estimates varied considerably across studies. The EQ-5D index range was 0.89 - 0.72 for mild/prodromal HD and 0.71 - 0.37 for severe/late-stage disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study uncovered high variability in published utility estimates, indicating substantial uncertainty in existing data. Further research is needed to better understand preferences and valuation across all stages and domains of HD symptoms and the degree to which generic utility measures capture the impact of cognitive changes on quality of life.

Healthcare utilization and direct medical costs of Huntington's disease among Medicaid beneficiaries in the United States.

AIMS: To provide more recent estimates of healthcare utilization and costs in Huntington's disease (HD) in the Medicaid population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis used administrative claims data for HD beneficiaries (≥1 HD claim; ICD-9-CM 333.4) from Medicaid Analytic eXtract data files from 1 January 2010-31 December 2014. The date of the first HD claim during the identification period (1 January 2011-31 December 2013) was assigned as the index date. If a beneficiary had multiple HD claims during the identification period, one was randomly chosen as the index date. Beneficiaries were required to be continuously enrolled in fee-for-service plans during the 1-year pre-index and post-index periods. Medicaid beneficiaries without HD were drawn from a 100% random sample and matched (3:1) to those with HD. Beneficiaries were classified by disease stage (early/middle/late). All-cause and HD-related (any utilization related to HD diagnosis or symptoms associated with HD) healthcare utilization and costs were reported. RESULTS: A total of 1,785 beneficiaries without HD were matched to 595 beneficiaries with HD (139 early-, 78 middle-, and 378 late-stage). The mean (SD) annual total costs were higher for beneficiaries with HD than beneficiaries without HD ($73,087 [$75,140] vs. $26,834 [$47,659], p <.001) and driven by inpatient costs ($45,190 [$48,185] vs. $13,808 [$39,596], p <.001). Total healthcare costs were highest among beneficiaries with late-stage HD (mean [SD] cost: $22,797 [$31,683] for early-stage HD vs. $55,294 [$129,290] for middle-stage HD vs. $95,251 [$60,197] for late-stage HD; p <.001). LIMITATIONS: Administrative claims are intended for billing purposes and subject to coding errors. This study did not address functional status, which may provide further insight to late-stage and end-of-life burden of HD, and indirect costs. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid beneficiaries with HD have higher acute healthcare utilization and costs compared to beneficiaries without HD, which tend to increase with disease progression, indicating that HD beneficiaries at later disease stages have greater burden.

Huntington's disease (HD) is a degenerative genetic disorder marked by progressive decline in cognitive and motor functions, leading to severe disability and loss of independence. The median and mean survival time after a diagnosis of HD is 15 years. Little is known about the kinds of health services used or costs associated with HD in the United States (US) in the Medicaid population. The study objective was to estimate healthcare utilization and direct medical spending among Medicaid beneficiaries with HD. The mean annual total costs were higher for beneficiaries with HD than beneficiaries without HD ($73,087 vs. $26,834). Mean total healthcare costs were highest among beneficiaries with late-stage HD ($22,797 for early-stage HD vs. $55,294 for middle-stage HD vs. $95,251 for late-stage HD). Medicaid beneficiaries with HD have higher acute healthcare utilization and costs compared to beneficiaries without HD, with utilization and costs increasing with disease progression, indicating that HD beneficiaries at later disease stages have greater burden.

Health related quality of life, service utilization and costs for patients with Huntington's disease in Norway.

BACKGROUND: Huntington's disease (HD) is a progressive genetic neurodegenerative disease accompanied by mental and neurocognitive disabilities, which requires long-term and comprehensive treatment and care. Information on the health and economic burden of HD is scarce, but essential for conducting health economic analyses, in light of the prospect of new therapies for HD. In this study, we aim to identify values for Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), describe service utilization and costs, and their associations with clinical and socio-demographic variables across all phases of HD. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including 86 patients across all phases of HD. Values of HRQoL were calculated based on EQ-5D-3L index scores. Additionally, health care and societal costs were estimated based on service utilization collected using the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) and data from the patients' interviews. Total societal costs included costs of primary and secondary health care services, informal care and productivity loss of the patients. Multiple regression analyses were used to investigate associations between socio-demographic and clinical variables on HRQoL and costs. RESULTS: HRQoL values declined, while total costs increased across disease severity. Total six-month healthcare costs and total societal costs were € 18,538 and € 66,789 respectively. Healthcare and societal costs doubled from early to middle phase, and tripled from middle to advanced disease phase. Main six-month cost components for the three disease phases were informal care costs (€ 30,605) accounting for approximately half the total societal costs, and costs due to production loss (€ 18,907) being slightly higher than the total healthcare costs. Disease severity and gender were found to have the strongest effect on both values of HRQoL and costs. CONCLUSIONS: Reported values of HRQoL and costs including costs for production loss may be used in modelling the cost-effectiveness of treatment for HD. Our results highlight the crucial role the informal caregivers play in the care provided to HD patients in all disease phases. Future research should focus on the estimation of productivity loss among informal caregivers.

Health care resource utilization and costs among individuals with vs without Huntington disease in a US population.

BACKGROUND: Quantifying the extent of health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with Huntington disease (HD) is vital for providers, decisionmakers, and payers to understand unmet treatment needs and to ensure limited resources can be used to benefit the maximum number of people with HD. OBJECTIVE: To quantify HCRU and costs for people with HD, overall and by disease stage, and compare these with non-HD controls. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial, Multi-State Medicaid, and Medicare Supplemental Databases from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018. People with an HD claim between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, were selected for this analysis and matched with non-HD controls for comparison. The HD cohort and the non-HD controls were exact matched on their follow-up duration and propensity score matched 1:4 to create the final analytical cohort. Index date was the first HD diagnosis for the HD cohort (proxy index date assigned to controls), and all individuals were required to have continuous enrollment for 12 or more months pre-index (baseline) and 3 or more months post-index. Proportions of all-cause HCRU (ie, outpatient visits, inpatient visits, emergency department visits, pharmacy fills, radiology visits, and physical/occupational therapy visits) in the 6-months post-index and HCRU counts and costs per patient per month (PPPM) over the entire follow-up were calculated for each cohort. RESULTS: A total of 2,473 individuals with HD and 9,522 matched non-HD controls were identified. HCRU in 6 months post-index was significantly greater in people with HD compared with non-HD controls for all health care service categories; P < 0.0001. The mean number of HCRU PPPM for all measured healthcare services was significantly higher in people with HD compared with non-HD controls (P < 0.001). Mean total costs (2018 USD PPPM) for the HD cohort ($2,260 [SD = $4,682]) were twice the total costs in the non-HD cohort ($1,056 [SD = $3,078]) (P < 0.0001) and were highest across all disease stages. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides current comprehensive HCRU and cost estimates in individuals with HD relative to those without the disease, thus demonstrating the high economic burden imposed by HD. DISCLOSURES: Dr Ta: Employment with Genentech (at time of study) and stock options with Roche; Dr To: Employment and stock options/dividends with Genentech; Dr Patel: Employment and stock options with Roche/Genentech; Dr Fuller: Employment with CHDI Management/CHDI Foundation; Mr Surinach: Employment with Genesis Research (which receives consulting fees from Genentech/Roche); Dr Abbass: Employment and stock options with Genentech; Dr Exuzides: Employment and stock options with Roche/Genentech; and Ms Luo: Employment with CHDI Management/CHDI Foundation. This study was funded by Genentech Inc. The authors thank Greg Rowe of Chrysalis Medical Communications for providing medical writing support, which was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines (http://www.ismpp.org/gpp3).

Geographic Barriers Drive Disparities in Specialty Center Access for Older Adults with Huntington's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Huntington's Disease Society of America Centers of Excellence (HDSA COEs) are primary hubs for Huntington's disease (HD) research opportunities and accessing new treatments. Data on the extent to which HDSA COEs are accessible to individuals with HD, particularly those older or disabled, are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To describe persons with HD in the U.S. Medicare program and characterize this population by proximity to an HDSA COE. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries ages ≥65 with HD in 2017. We analyzed data on benefit entitlement, demographics, and comorbidities. QGis software and Google Maps Interface were employed to estimate the distance from each patient to the nearest HDSA COE, and the proportion of individuals residing within 100 miles of these COEs at the state level. RESULTS: Among 9,056 Medicare beneficiaries with HD, 54.5% were female, 83.0% were white; 48.5% were ≥65 years, but 64.9% originally qualified for Medicare due to disability. Common comorbidities were dementia (32.4%) and depression (35.9%), and these were more common in HD vs. non-HD patients. Overall, 5,144 (57.1%) lived within 100 miles of a COE. Race/ethnicity, sex, age, and poverty markers were not associated with below-average proximity to HDSA COEs. The proportion of patients living within 100 miles of a center varied from < 10% (16 states) to > 90% (7 states). Most underserved states were in the Mountain and West Central divisions. CONCLUSION: Older Medicare beneficiaries with HD are frequently disabled and have a distinct comorbidity profile. Geographical, rather than sociodemographic factors, define the HD population with limited access to HDSA COEs.

Disease Burden of Huntington's Disease (HD) on People Living with HD and Care Partners in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Huntington's disease (HD) has been shown to reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and affect healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among patients and care partners internationally but has not been studied specifically in the Canadian context. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the burden of HD on individuals with HD and care partners of individuals with HD in Canada. METHODS: An online survey was distributed (September 14-November 23, 2020) through patient organizations to collect data on demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as: HRQoL, measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36v1); HRU, measured using the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI); and care partner burden, measured using the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) and Huntington's Disease Quality of Life Battery for Carers (HDQoL-C). Descriptive statistics were used to report data and compare subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 62 adult individuals with HD (or their proxies) and 48 care partners met defined eligibility criteria. The mean [standard deviation] age was 51.2 [13.8] and 58.1 [13.9] years for individuals with HD and care partner respondents, respectively. For individuals with HD, the greatest HRQoL burden (i.e., lowest score) was for the SF-36v1 Role -Physical scale (46.8 [42.9]). HRU was higher for some services (e.g., general practitioner visits) for respondents who had experienced motor onset transition. Among care partners, 55.3% experienced high strain, as indicated by the CSI. The HDQoL-C showed the greatest HRQoL burden in feelings about life (45.1 [17.9]). CONCLUSION: This study quantified the substantial burden on individuals with HD and care partners in Canada, addressing a critical knowledge gap that can affect the availability of and access to healthcare services.

Disparities in Palliative Care Utilization Among Hospitalized People With Huntington Disease: A National Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: People with Huntington's disease (HD) often become institutionalized and more frequently die away from the home setting. The reasons behind differences in end-of-life care are poorly understood. Less than 5% of people with HD report utilization of palliative care (PC) or hospice services, regardless of the lack of curative therapies for this neurodegenerative disease. It is unknown what factors are associated with in-patient specialty PC consultation in this population and how PC might be related to discharge disposition. OBJECTIVES: To determine what HD-specific (e.g., psychosis) and serious illness-specific factors (e.g., resuscitation preferences) are associated with PC encounters in people with HD and explore how PC encounters are associated with discharge disposition. DESIGN: We analyzed factors associated with PC consultation for people with HD using discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. An anonymized, cross-sectional, and stratified sample of 20% of United States hospitalizations from 2007 through 2014 were included using ICD-9 codes. RESULTS: 8521 patients with HD were admitted to the hospital. Of those, 321 (3.8%) received specialty PC. Payer type, (specifically private insurer or other insurer as compared to Medicare), income, (specifically the top quartile as compared to the bottom quartile), mortality risk, D.N.R., aspiration pneumonia, and depression were significantly associated with PC in a multivariate model. Among those who received PC, the odds ratio (OR) of discharge to a facility was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.32-0.58), whereas the OR of discharge to home with services was 2.25 (95% CI 1.57-3.23), even after adjusting for possible confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with HD, economic factors, depression, and serious illness-specific factors were associated with PC, and PC was associated with discharge disposition. These findings have implications for the adaptation of inpatient PC models to meet the needs of persons with HD.

Healthcare Delivery and Huntington's Disease During the Time of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Safer-at-home orders during the COVID-19 pandemic altered the structure of clinical care for Huntington's disease (HD) patients. This shift provided an opportunity to identify limitations in the current healthcare infrastructure and how these may impact the health and well-being of persons with HD. OBJECTIVE: The study objectives were to assess the feasibility of remote healthcare delivery in HD patients, to identify socioeconomic factors which may explain differences in feasibility and to evaluate the impact of safer-at-home orders on HD patient stress levels. METHODS: This observational study of a clinical HD population during the 'safer-at-home' orders asked patients or caregivers about their current access to healthcare resources and patient stress levels. A chart review allowed for an assessment of socioeconomic status and characterization of HD severity. RESULTS: Two-hundred and twelve HD patients were contacted with 156 completing the survey. During safer-at-home orders, the majority of HD patients were able to obtain medications and see a physician; however, 25% of patients would not commit to regular telehealth visits, and less than 50% utilized an online healthcare platform. We found that 37% of participants were divorced/single, 39% had less than a high school diploma, and nearly 20% were uninsured or on low-income health insurance. Patient stress levels correlated with disease burden. CONCLUSION: A significant portion of HD participants were not willing to participate in telehealth services. Potential explanations for these limitations may include socioeconomic barriers and caregiving structure. These observations illustrate areas for clinical care improvement to address healthcare disparities in the HD community.

Addressing the Value of Multidisciplinary Clinical Care in Huntington's Disease: A Snapshot of a New Huntington's Disease Center.

BACKGROUND: Clinical care for Huntington's disease (HD) is often provided in experienced centers that provide multidisciplinary care. However, the value of these centers and their uptake by HD families remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the services provided by a new HD center, including estimates of capture of the population served. METHODS: Retrospective review of a HD Center launched in 2015, including quantitative and qualitative data on clinic visits, demographic and clinical data. RESULTS: We observed a rapid and ongoing growth on the annual number of clinic encounters, with high demand for in-clinic multidisciplinary care. Using census data and estimates of HD prevalence, we determined that we served about 20% of local patients with HD. Most HD patients received pharmacological treatment for psychiatric symptoms, and over half were treated for chorea. About 25% of new HD diagnoses were on patients without family history of HD. Finally, the demand for predictive testing in at risk individuals significantly increased following the press release reporting the successful completion of the Ionis-HTTRx (RG 6042) trial. CONCLUSIONS: This report indicates a high demand for multidisciplinary care by HD families, supporting its value, providing a snapshot of the organization and function of a single center. Furthermore, it demonstrates how dissemination of news related to research advances influence clinical behavior. Reporting similar information from other HD centers to would provide us with a more global view of the status of HD care across multiple geographical areas.

Large-Brained Animal Models of Huntington's Disease: Sheep.

The limitations of using small-brained rodents to model diseases that affect large-brain humans are becoming increasingly obvious as novel therapies emerge. Huntington's disease (HD) is one such disease. In recent years, the desirability of a large-brained, long-lived animal model of HD for preclinical testing has changed into a necessity. Treatment involving gene therapy in particular presents delivery challenges that are currently unsolved. Models using long-lived, large-brained animals would be useful, not only for refining methods of delivery (particularly for gene and other therapies that do not involve small molecules) but also for measuring long-term "off-target" effects, and assessing the efficacy of therapies. With their large brains and convoluted cortices, sheep are emerging as feasible experimental subjects that can be used to bridge the gap between rodents and humans in preclinical drug development. Sheep are readily available, economical to use, and easy to care for in naturalistic settings. With brains of a similar size to a large rhesus macaque, they have much to offer. The only thing that was missing until recently was the means of testing their neurological function and behavior using approaches and methods that are relevant to HD. In this chapter, I will outline the present and future possibilities of using sheep and testing as large animal models of HD.

Minipigs as a Large-Brained Animal Model for Huntington's Disease: From Behavior and Imaging to Gene Therapy.

Large animal models offer novel opportunities in exploring safety, biology, and efficacy of novel therapeutic approaches for Huntington's disease (HD). Challenges in the development of, for example, gene therapy, such as delivery, distribution, and persistence of virus vectors or oligo sense nucleotides, can be explored in large brains and organisms approaching human size. We here introduce the transgenic Libechov minipig as a large animal model of HD. Methods developed to assess motor, cognitive, and behavioral features expected to manifest in an HD model are described. We also outline established protocols for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for minipigs. The successful conduct of long-term follow-up studies over several years with repeated behavioral testing and imaging is reported. We discuss the advantages and limitations of using this model with regard to translational reliability, homology to humans and with respect to feasibility, breeding, housing, handling, and finally ethical considerations. It is concluded that minipigs can fulfill an important role in preclinical development to bridge the gap between rodents and nonhuman primate research in the translation to humans.

Nonhuman Primate Models of Huntington's Disease and Their Application in Translational Research.

Huntington's disease (HD) is a monogenic, autosomal dominant inherited fatal disease that affects 1 in 10,000 people worldwide. Given its unique genetic characteristics, HD would appear as one of the most straightforward neurodegenerative diseases to replicate in animal models. Indeed, mutations in the HTT gene have been used to generate a variety of animal models that display differential pathologies and have significantly increased our understanding of the pathological mechanisms of HD. However, decades of efforts have also shown the complexity of recapitulating the human condition in other species. Here we describe the three different types of models that have been generated in nonhuman primate species, stating their advantages and limitations and attempt to give a critical perspective of their translational value to test the efficacy of novel therapeutic strategies. Obtaining construct, phenotypic, and predictive validity has proven to be challenging in most animal models of human diseases. In HD in particular, it is hard to assess the predictive validity of a new therapeutic strategy when no effective "benchmark" treatment is available in the clinic. In this light, only phenotypic/face validity and construct validity are discussed.

Utilization of Hospice Services in a Population of Patients With Huntington's Disease.

CONTEXT: Although the early and middle stages of Huntington's disease (HD) and its complications have been well described, less is known about the course of late-stage illness. In particular, little is known about the population of patients who enroll in hospice. OBJECTIVES: Our goal is to describe the characteristics of patients with HD who enrolled in hospice. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of electronic medical record data from 12 not-for-profit hospices in the United States from 2008 to 2012. RESULTS: Of the 164,032 patients admitted to these hospices, 101 (0.06%) had a primary diagnosis of HD. Their median age was 57 (IQR 48-65) and 53 (52.5%) were women. Most patients were cared for by a spouse (n = 36, 36.6%) or adult child (n = 20, 19.8%). At the time of admission, most patients were living either at home (n = 39, 38.6%) or in a nursing home (n = 41, 40.6%). All were either bedbound or could ambulate only with assistance. The most common symptom reported during enrollment in hospice was pain (n = 34, 33.7%) followed by anxiety (n = 30, 29.7%), nausea (n = 18, 17.8%), and dyspnea (n = 10, 9.9%). Patients had a median length of stay in hospice of 42 days, which was significantly longer than that of other hospice patients in the sample (17 days), P < 0.001. Of the 101 patients who were admitted to hospice, 73 died, 11 were still enrolled at the time of data analysis, and 17 left hospice either because they no longer met eligibility criteria (n = 14, 13.7%) or because they decided to seek treatment for other medical conditions (n = 3, 3.0%). Of the 73 patients who died while on hospice, most died either in a nursing home (n = 29; 40%) or a hospital (n = 27; 37%). Seventeen patients (23%) died at home. No patient that started in a facility died at home. CONCLUSION: Patients with HD are admitted to hospice at a younger age compared with other patients (57 vs. 76 years old) but have a significant symptom burden and limited functional status. Although hospice care emphasizes the importance of helping patients to remain in their homes, only a minority of these patients were able to die at home.

Health-related quality of life and unmet healthcare needs in Huntington's disease.

BACKGROUND: Huntington's disease (HD) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder with a prevalence of 6 per 100.000. Despite increasing research activity on HD, evidence on healthcare utilization, patients' needs for healthcare services and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) is still sparse. The present study describes HRQoL in a Norwegian cohort of HD patients, and assesses associations between unmet healthcare and social support service needs and HRQoL. METHODS: In this cross-sectional population-based study, 84 patients with a clinical diagnosis of HD living in the South-East of Norway completed the HRQoL questionnaire EuroQol, EQ-5D-3L. Unmet needs for healthcare and social support services were assessed by the Needs and Provision Complexity Scale (NPCS). Furthermore, functional ability was determined using the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Functional assessment scales. Socio-demographics (age, gender, marital status, occupation, residence, housing situation) and clinical characteristics (disease duration, total functional capacity, comorbidity) were also recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the patients' HRQoL. Regression analyses were conducted in order to investigate the relationship between unmet healthcare needs and self-reported HRQoL. RESULTS: The patients were divided across five disease stages as follows: Stage I: n = 12 (14%), Stage II: n = 22 (27%), Stage III: n = 19 (23%), Stage IV: n = 14 (16%), and Stage V: n = 17 (20%). Overall HRQoL was lowest in patients with advanced disease (Stages IV and V), while patients in the middle phase (Stage III) showed the most varied health profile for the five EQ-5D-3L dimensions. The regression model including level of unmet needs, clinical characteristics and demographics (age and education) accounted for 42% of variance in HRQoL. A higher level of unmet needs was associated with lower HRQoL (ß value - 0.228; p = 0.018) whereas a better total functional capacity corresponded to higher HRQoL (ß value 0.564; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that patients with HD do not receive healthcare services that could have a positive impact on their HRQoL.

Survey of the Huntington's Disease Patient and Caregiver Community Reveals Most Impactful Symptoms and Treatment Needs.

BACKGROUND: In preparation for a meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Patient-Focused Drug Development in Huntington's disease, the Huntington's Disease Society of America (HDSA) created and distributed two comprehensive surveys on the symptom experience and treatment approaches for Huntington's disease. OBJECTIVE: The objective of these surveys was to identify the specific symptoms that most impact the daily lives of individuals with Huntington's disease/Juvenile Huntington's disease (HD/JHD) and their caregivers and to solicit input on the types of treatments desired by HD affected families. The data were shared with the FDA to offer background and insight in preparation for the patient-focused meeting, as well as to ensure representation by the community in a manner that would complement those who attended in person. METHODS: Two distinct surveys were created using SurveyMonkey to capture patient and caregiver perspectives on HD symptoms and current treatments. HDSA distributed the surveys to the HD community in August and September 2014 and collected responses through January 2015. RESULTS: More than 3,600 responses to the two surveys were received. The data showed that both caregivers and individuals with HD were severely impacted by the cognitive and behavioral symptoms of HD with HD patients reporting problems with executive functioning and cognitive decline as most impactful to them. However, 30 percent of caregivers reported that chorea was the most impactful symptom compared to 17 percent of people with HD. Across all the symptom categories, patients reported a lower occurrence of symptoms than were reported by their caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: With only one drug approved for treatment of a symptom of Huntington's disease and no disease modifying treatments available, there is a critical need for new medicines to treat the cognitive, psychiatric and motor symptoms associated with HD. While the surveys did not capture risk/benefit data, the data collected do provide new insights around the different perspectives of patients and caregivers. We believe that industry development of treatments would be well-informed by incorporating the patient community, which is more knowledgeable and engaged than given credit, in consideration of treatment regimens, risk-benefit and priorities for therapeutic development.

Health Care Delivery Practices in Huntington's Disease Specialty Clinics: An International Survey.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the organization of clinical services for Huntington's disease (HD). OBJECTIVE: To describe how health care services are organized and delivered in HD-clinics taking part in or eligible for the Enroll-HD study. METHODS: In 2014, a 69-item survey was administered to sites taking part in or eligible for the Enroll-HD study. RESULTS: Of 231 sites surveyed, 121 (52.2%) sites in Europe, North America, Latin America, and Oceania responded. Most sites in the sample serve large populations, with 61.1% serving more than 1.5 million people, and a further 33% serving >500,000. Almost all (86.0%) centers see patients from outside their region. The majority of centers (59.7%) follow 50-199 patients, 21.9% care for more than 200. Most centers provide care in all stages of HD, and nearly all review pre-symptomatic cases. Multidisciplinary case reviews are offered in 54.5% of sites, with outreach clinics offered by 48.1%. Videoconferencing and telemedicine are used by 23.6%. Separate consultations for caregivers are offered in more than half of the centers. Most centers (70.4%) report following published guidelines or local care pathways for HD. CONCLUSIONS: Most centers serve a large population and use a multidisciplinary approach. The survey gives insight into factors underpinning HD service delivery globally. There is a need for more in-depth studies of clinical practice to understand how services are organized and how such features may be associated with quality of care.